OSK Construction
Write a review
    OSK Construction
    (11 reviews)
    Write a review
    Write a review

    Company Reviews

    Working at OSK Construction

    2.911 ratings in total
    5
    2
    4
    2
    3
    3
    2
    1
    1
    3
    91%
    Rate salary as high or average
    55%
    Employees recommend this employer to friends
    Work/Life balance
    2.5(11 ratings)
    Career development
    2.5(11 ratings)
    Benefits & perks
    2.5(11 ratings)
    Management
    2.5(11 ratings)
    Working environment
    2.7(11 ratings)
    Diversity & equal opportunity
    1.7(3 ratings)
    Ratings for OSK Construction are shared as-is from employees in line with our community guidelines

    Reviews

    Showing 11 reviews sorted by most recent
    Sort by
    most recent
    1.0
    Senior Manager
    Oct 2025
    Kuala Lumpur City Centre Kuala Lumpur9 to 10 years in the role, former employee
    Promising entry, but career paths and support need improvement.
    The good thingsOne of the things I truly appreciate about OSK is the leadership direction set by the Chairman. He is highly visionary, always looking ahead and driving the organisation toward long-term growth and sustainability. His forward-thinking mindset inspires confidence, innovation, and a clear sense of purpose throughout the company.
    The challengesAnother concern is the lack of clear and consistent strategic direction from top management. There are high expectations for results, but the necessary guidance, resources, and support are not always provided. Strengthening leadership alignment, improving decision-making clarity, and ensuring teams are properly supported would help drive better outcomes and reduce unnecessary operational pressure.
    1.0
    Procurement Executive
    Aug 2025
    Kuala Lumpur City Centre Kuala LumpurLess than 1 year in the role, former employee
    Manager’s style detrimental to workplace culture
    The good thingsNo positive qualities were evident. The manager’s conduct created persistent challenges and setbacks.
    The challenges• No effective leadership strengths. • Practiced excessive micromanagement. • Publicly reprimanded staff over minor matters instead of resolving issues constructively. • Appeared willing to provide guidance during the interview but failed to do so, yet placed high expectations on new employees and reacted irritably to questions. • Pressured staff to work late (7:00–8:30 PM) despite the company’s flexible working policy. staff were required to inform her if they intended to leave on time — an unnecessary and unreasonable demand. • Frequently assigned “urgent” tasks right before the end of the day. • Escalated small issues into public conflicts, creating tension and reducing morale. • Behaved unprofessionally when staff resigned, openly showing resentment and making negative remarks about them to other departments in their presence. • Frequently made disparaging remarks about colleagues she personally disliked, undermining respect and trust.
    12 people found this helpful
    2.0
    Project Management General Manager
    Feb 2025
    Cheras Kuala Lumpur1 to 2 years in the role, former employee
    Do not performance anything other than following SOP.
    The good thingsJob scope defined clearly.
    The challengesNot easy to change the SOP.
    2 people found this helpful
    4.0
    Leasing executive
    Mar 2023
    3 to 4 years in the role, former employee
    Opportunity to explore
    The good thingsProper support from the company, never late on salary.
    The challengesNo proper career path was lay, benefit of staff should improve
    5.0
    Manager
    Nov 2022
    Clear directions and empowerment with trust
    The good thingsHumanity and respect Feels like a family Positive vibes
    The challengesTo work together with team members to achieve the goal setting
    1.0
    Internal audit
    Nov 2019
    1 to 2 years in the role, former employee
    Below Average
    The good thingsColleagues are friendly
    The challengesUnorganised Internal Audit Dept. Need improvement.
    5.0
    IT manager
    Jul 2015
    5 to 6 years in the role, former employee
    IT Executive
    The good thingsTeamwork, good employer, best welfare, career development, nice employees, less office politic
    The challengesSalary not up to market price
    1 person found this helpful
    3.0
    Company secretarial executive
    Jun 2015
    Less than 1 year in the role, former employee
    Working experience in pj development
    The good thingsNice colleague. Work life balance. Not too office politic, personally I never encounter any. Comfortable working place, not too pack. Company dinner, lunch talk every month, free hotel stay at family own hotels.
    The challengesManagement change caused: Uncertainty to employee as to who to report to inconsistency of instruction, double work due to changing of instruction Changing working place, moving office High turnover caused by lots of uncertainty, including senior position
    2 people found this helpful
    4.0
    Assistant project manager
    Jun 2015
    9 to 10 years in the role, former employee
    overall working environment
    The good thingsResult oriented organisation Systematic
    The challengesNew top management taken over with new approach.
    3.0
    HR assistant
    Jun 2015
    1 to 2 years in the role, former employee
    Room to improve
    The good thingsColleagues, location.
    The challengesManagement style
    3.0
    Secretarial
    Jun 2015
    1 to 2 years in the role, former employee
    Working at PJD Management Services S/B
    The good thingsRegular company trainings, understanding boss, etc...
    The challengesConservative thinking management, not enough benefits and perks, poor working environment, etc...
    Company Reviews published on our site are the views and opinions of their authors and do not represent the views and opinions of Jobstreet or its personnel. Jobstreet does not verify the truth or accuracy of any reviews and does not adopt or endorse any of the comments posted. Jobstreet posts reviews for what they are worth and for informational purposes only to assist candidates to find employment.